HomeServicesIncome TaxDirect & Corporate Tax Advisory

Income Tax · Tax Advisory & Planning

Direct & Corporate Tax Advisory

Corporate tax is not a once-a-year filing exercise — it is a set of decisions made throughout the year that determine how much of your profit you keep.

Chartered Accountants · Chennai · Hyderabad · Bangalore · Dubai · Since 1986

2,000+Clients since 1986
42 yrsCA practice
4Offices · India & UAE
24 hrsResponse time

Corporate tax is not a once-a-year filing exercise — it is a set of decisions made throughout the year that determine how much of your profit you keep. At PNPC Global, we advise companies, LLPs, and groups on structuring, tax-regime selection, transaction planning, and compliance discipline that legally minimises the tax burden while standing up to scrutiny. Since 1986, we have guided businesses across India and the UAE through corporate tax planning that goes well beyond return preparation — into the structuring decisions made before a transaction happens, when the tax outcome can still be shaped.

What it costs

Govt. feesGovernment & statutory fees as applicable to your case
Professional feeFixed professional fee — confirmed in writing before we start

No hidden charges. The exact figure is set in your engagement letter.

What Direct & Corporate Tax Advisory is

Direct & Corporate Tax Advisory is the practice of planning a company's tax position proactively — before transactions happen — rather than simply reporting what already occurred. It covers choice of tax regime (concessional corporate rates under Sections 115BAA/115BAB versus the standard rate), capital structure (debt versus equity, and the interest-deduction implications), related-party and group transactions (transfer pricing under Sections 92 to 92F), treatment of specific income streams (capital gains, business income, income from other sources), utilisation of deductions and incentives that remain available under the current law, and the tax consequences of restructuring events such as mergers, demergers, slump sales, and share transfers. It also covers withholding tax (TDS) discipline on payments the company makes, advance tax computation and payment, and MAT/AMT exposure where applicable.

India's direct tax framework is in a period of structural transition. The Income-tax Act, 1961 — the statute that has governed direct taxation in India for over six decades — has been replaced by the Income Tax Act, 2025, which received presidential assent in 2025 and takes effect from 1 April 2026 (Assessment Year 2026-27). The new Act substantially re-numbers and reorganises the provisions of the 1961 Act while preserving most of the underlying tax policy — concepts such as the corporate tax rate structure, TDS obligations, and transfer pricing principles carry forward, but under new section references and a restructured chapter layout. Until 31 March 2026, the 1961 Act (with its familiar section numbers — 44AB, 44AD, 194C, 194J, 92CA, 115BAA, and so on) continues to apply for the current and immediately preceding assessment years, and most compliance and advisory work through this period is still transacted under those references. PNPC tracks both the outgoing and incoming frameworks so that clients are not caught unprepared at the transition, and we advise clients to treat any pre-2026 material citing 1961-Act section numbers as historically accurate but due for a mapping exercise closer to April 2026.

Corporate tax advisory sits at the intersection of compliance and strategy. A company that opts into the concessional tax regime under Section 115BAA (22% base rate, effective rate approximately 25.17% including surcharge and cess) permanently forfeits specified deductions and incentives — the decision, once made for a financial year, is not freely reversible. A company planning a fundraise, an internal restructuring, or an outbound investment needs the tax consequences modelled before the transaction is signed, not after. A group with related-party transactions across entities needs transfer pricing documentation (Form 3CEB, local file, master file where thresholds are crossed) prepared contemporaneously — not reconstructed under audit pressure. This is where a practising CA firm's judgment on your specific fact pattern differs meaningfully from a generic return-filing service.

Beyond corporate income tax itself, this advisory line covers the withholding tax obligations a company carries as a payer — since Budget 2025, several TDS thresholds were revised to reduce compliance burden on smaller payments (for example, the threshold for TDS on rent under Section 194-I and on professional/technical fees under Section 194J was raised to ₹50,000 in aggregate for the financial year, effective from 1 April 2025), advance tax instalment planning to avoid interest under Sections 234B and 234C, and MAT computation under Section 115JB for companies that remain outside the concessional regime. PNPC's advisory engagement typically runs on a retainer basis — reviewing transactions as they arise through the year rather than only at year-end.

When corporate tax advisory adds real value

Deciding between the concessional tax regime (Section 115BAA/115BAB) and the standard regime — a decision that is largely irreversible once elected for a year and depends on your deduction and incentive profile

Planning a fundraise, merger, demerger, slump sale, or share transfer — where the tax structuring decisions made before signing determine the after-tax outcome

Running related-party or intercompany transactions (management fees, royalty, intercompany loans, cost allocations) that trigger transfer pricing documentation obligations under Sections 92 to 92F

Structuring director remuneration, dividend policy, and retained-earnings decisions to optimise the combined company-and-individual tax position

Operating with cross-border income flows (outbound payments, foreign subsidiaries, DTAA claims) where withholding tax and Form 15CA/15CB compliance intersect with corporate tax planning

Facing a scale-up in profitability where advance tax instalment planning becomes material to cash flow and where MAT exposure needs to be modelled

Undergoing a tax audit, assessment, or scrutiny notice where the underlying tax positions taken in earlier years need defending with contemporaneous documentation

Building a group structure (holding company, subsidiaries, LLPs) where tax leakage between entities needs active management rather than after-the-fact discovery

When lighter-touch compliance may be enough

A very small company or LLP with simple, single-stream income and no related-party transactions, no restructuring plans, and stable low profitability — basic annual return filing and statutory audit support may be sufficient without an ongoing advisory retainer

A business that has already finalised its capital structure and regime election, has no transactions in progress, and needs only routine annual compliance (ITR filing, advance tax computation) — a standard compliance engagement covers this without the advisory layer

An individual proprietor or partnership below the tax-audit threshold with no plans to incorporate or restructure — corporate tax advisory concepts (115BAA, transfer pricing, MAT) simply do not apply to non-corporate, non-LLP taxpayers in the same way

A dormant or pre-revenue company with no transactions to plan around — advisory value is limited until there is an actual profit stream, transaction, or structural decision to optimise

A one-off need such as a single TDS query or a single Form 15CA/15CB certificate — engaging our dedicated TDS compliance or Form 15CA/15CB service lines directly is more cost-efficient than a broader advisory retainer

Structure Comparison

Corporate tax regime and structuring choices compared

ConsiderationSection 115BAA (existing companies)Section 115BAB (new manufacturing)Standard corporate rateLLP / Partnership taxation
Base tax rate22%15%30% (25% for companies with turnover up to ₹400 crore in the relevant prior year, subject to conditions)30% flat on firm income
Effective rate incl. surcharge & cess~25.17%~17.16%~29.12%–34.94% depending on turnover and surcharge slab~30%–34.6% incl. surcharge/cess on firm; partner remuneration taxed separately at slab
EligibilityAny domestic company, subject to not claiming specified deductions/incentivesNew domestic manufacturing company set up and registered on or after 1 Oct 2019, commencing production by the prescribed deadlineDefault regime for companies not opting into 115BAA/115BABRegistered partnership firms and LLPs
MAT applicabilityNot applicable (MAT does not apply to companies opting for 115BAA)Not applicableMAT under Section 115JB applies, generally at 15% of book profitAlternate Minimum Tax (AMT) may apply to LLPs claiming specified deductions
Deductions/incentives forfeitedYes — specified deductions (e.g., additional depreciation, certain investment-linked deductions) are given up permanently for the option periodYes — similar forfeiture, plus stricter conditions on business activity and new-plant requirementDeductions and incentives remain available as applicableDeductions available as per firm/LLP provisions
Reversibility of electionOnce exercised, generally continues for that and subsequent years; cannot be withdrawn for the same reasons once availed except in limited circumstancesSimilar — election is largely a one-way structural decisionNot applicable — this is the default positionNot an elective regime — applies automatically to the entity type
Best suited forProfitable companies with limited reliance on investment-linked deductions, seeking rate certaintyNew manufacturing set-ups planning fresh plant and machinery investmentCompanies still utilising accumulated deductions, incentives, or carried-forward losses tied to the standard regimeProfessional service firms, small partnerships without incorporation plans
Dividend/profit distribution tax treatmentDividend taxed in shareholders' hands at slab rate; no separate DDT (abolished since FY 2020-21)Same as 115BAASame — no separate DDTProfit share to partners is exempt in partners' hands (already taxed at firm level); remuneration and interest to partners taxed as business income
Transfer pricing applicabilityApplies if related-party/international or specified domestic transactions cross thresholdsApplies identicallyApplies identicallyApplies identically where LLP has related-party transactions

This is a structural comparison for planning discussions, not a recommendation for any specific company. The right regime and structure depend on your deduction profile, carried-forward losses, investment plans, group structure, and multi-year profitability projection — always modelled with a practising CA before an election is made, since several of these choices are difficult or impossible to reverse.

How it works
#Stage & What PNPC DoesCA Advice Portals Never GiveTimeline
1Diagnostic Review — current tax position, regime, and structure assessmentWe map your existing tax regime election, deduction utilisation, group structure, related-party flows, and carried-forward losses against your 2–3 year business plan before recommending any change. A regime switch that looks attractive this year can be the wrong call once carried-forward losses and planned capex are factored in.Week 1–2
2Regime Election Analysis — 115BAA / 115BAB / standard regime modellingWe build a multi-year projection comparing effective tax outcomes under each regime, factoring in your specific deduction and incentive profile — not a generic rate comparison. The decision is largely irreversible once made, so we model before you elect, not after.Week 2–3
3Capital Structure Review — debt vs equity, interest deductibility, thin-capitalisation exposureInterest deductibility on related-party debt is subject to limitations under Section 94B (thin capitalisation rules) where interest paid to an associated enterprise exceeds prescribed thresholds. We review your funding structure — director loans, related-party debt, external borrowing — against this and other deduction-limitation provisions before you finalise financing.Week 3–4
4Related-Party Transaction Mapping — transfer pricing exposure assessmentWe identify every intercompany and related-party flow — management fees, royalty, cost-sharing, intercompany loans, guarantees — and assess which cross the specified domestic transaction or international transaction thresholds under Sections 92 to 92F, triggering Form 3CEB and documentation obligations.Week 3–5
5Transaction Structuring Advisory — mergers, demergers, slump sales, share transfersWhere a transaction is contemplated, we model the tax consequences of alternative structures — asset sale versus slump sale versus share sale, merger under Sections 230–232 of the Companies Act with tax-neutral treatment under Section 2(1B)/47, or a demerger — before the deal documents are drafted, when structuring choices still exist.As transaction arises
6Withholding Tax (TDS) Framework Review — payer-side compliance mappingWe map every category of payment your company makes — rent, professional fees, contractor payments, commission, interest — against current TDS provisions and thresholds, flag payments where TDS discipline has lapsed, and correct the process before a demand notice or Section 40(a)(ia) disallowance arises.Week 4–6
7Advance Tax & MAT Planning — quarterly instalment calculation and cash flow alignmentWe calculate advance tax liability across all four instalments (by 15 June, 15 September, 15 December, 15 March) based on updated in-year projections — not a static estimate from April — to avoid interest under Sections 234B and 234C while keeping cash deployed in the business as long as possible.Quarterly, ongoing
8Director Remuneration & Dividend Policy StructuringWe model the combined company-and-individual tax impact of alternative director remuneration levels, dividend distributions, and retained-earnings strategies — since remuneration is deductible to the company but taxed as salary to the director, while dividends are non-deductible to the company but taxed at the shareholder's slab rate.Annual review, or on request
9Transfer Pricing Documentation — Form 3CEB, local file, master file preparationWhere thresholds are crossed, we prepare the accountant's report in Form 3CEB, contemporaneous benchmarking documentation (local file), and — where consolidated group revenue exceeds the prescribed threshold — the master file and Country-by-Country Report coordination.Before the tax audit due date each year
10Tax Audit Coordination — working alongside the statutory/tax auditorCorporate tax advisory decisions feed directly into the tax audit report (Form 3CD) prepared under Section 44AB. We coordinate with your tax auditor (which may or may not be PNPC, depending on independence requirements) to ensure positions taken in advisory are correctly reflected and defensible in the audit report.Annually, ahead of the due date
11Assessment & Scrutiny Support — responding when a position is questionedWhen a tax position taken in an earlier year is questioned in scrutiny or reassessment, we prepare the technical defence — case law, contemporaneous documentation, and the original rationale for the position — rather than reconstructing the argument after the fact.As notices arise
12Annual Tax Planning Review — pre-year-end structuring windowIn the final quarter of the financial year, we run a structured review: capital expenditure timing, provisions and write-offs, related-party settlements, and any last opportunity to optimise the year's tax position within the law before the books close.January–March each year

Corporate tax advisory is not a linear, one-time project — it runs on an ongoing retainer basis, with certain milestones (regime election, transaction structuring, transfer pricing documentation) tied to specific events in the company's calendar. PNPC structures the engagement around your actual transaction and reporting calendar rather than a fixed generic timeline.

Document Checklist
Corporate & Structural Documents

Certificate of Incorporation, Memorandum and Articles of Association — to confirm entity type, objects, and any structural constraints relevant to tax planning

Group structure chart — all related entities (subsidiaries, holding company, LLPs, sister concerns) with shareholding percentages, both in India and overseas

Shareholders' Agreement and any investor-side tax covenants (e.g., warranties on tax compliance, indemnities) that may constrain structuring options

Board resolutions relevant to prior tax elections (e.g., 115BAA/115BAB opt-in), if already made in an earlier year

Details of any pending restructuring — merger, demerger, slump sale, or share transfer under discussion

Financial & Tax History

Last 3 years' audited financial statements and tax audit reports (Form 3CD)

Last 3 years' income tax returns (ITR-6) and computation sheets, including carried-forward loss and depreciation schedules

Details of any deductions or incentives currently claimed (investment-linked deductions, SEZ benefits, R&D deductions where applicable) that would be forfeited under a regime switch

Advance tax payment history and any interest paid under Sections 234B/234C in prior years

MAT credit balance carried forward, if the company has historically been on the standard regime

Related-Party & Transaction Data

List of all related-party transactions for the relevant financial year — intercompany loans, management fees, royalty, cost allocations, guarantees, and goods/services transactions

Existing transfer pricing documentation (Form 3CEB, local file, master file) from prior years, if any

Details of any cross-border payments — including recipient details, nature of payment, and applicable DTAA claimed

Term sheets, share purchase agreements, or scheme documents for any transaction currently in progress

Payroll & Withholding (TDS) Records

Vendor and contractor payment ledger with TDS deduction status for the relevant period

Director remuneration structure — salary, sitting fees, commission, and any perquisites — with TDS treatment applied

Rent, professional fee, and contractor payment schedules, to verify correct application of current TDS thresholds and rates

TDS return filing history (Form 24Q/26Q) for the relevant quarters

Cross-Border & FEMA-Linked Documents (where applicable)

Details of any foreign subsidiary, branch, or overseas investment (ODI) and its tax treatment in the foreign jurisdiction

DTAA-relevant documents — Tax Residency Certificate (TRC) of the foreign counterparty, Form 10F, and beneficial ownership declarations

FC-GPR/FC-TRS filings for any foreign shareholding, relevant to understanding capital structure

Transfer pricing study or benchmarking analysis for cross-border related-party transactions, if separately maintained

Engagement & Advisory Scope Documents

Signed engagement letter defining the scope of the advisory retainer, fee structure, and confidentiality terms

Board authorisation (where required) for PNPC to liaise with tax authorities or represent the company in assessment proceedings

Any prior tax opinions or advisory memos from other advisors, to ensure continuity and avoid inconsistent positions across advisors

Ongoing obligations
PhaseTriggered ByPNPC CA GuidanceRisk If Ignored
Regime Election DecisionCompany reaches sustained profitability or first profitable yearMulti-year modelling of 115BAA/115BAB versus standard regime, factoring deduction forfeiture, carried-forward losses, and planned capex before the election is made in the return for that year.An irreversible regime election made without modelling can lock in a higher effective tax rate for years, or forfeit valuable incentives the company did not realise it was giving up.
Capital Structure Setup / ChangeFundraise, related-party loan, or new borrowingReview of debt-equity mix against thin-capitalisation limits under Section 94B, and structuring of intercompany loans with appropriate interest rates and documentation to withstand transfer pricing scrutiny.Excess related-party interest disallowed under Section 94B; intercompany loans priced incorrectly trigger transfer pricing adjustments and penalty exposure.
Ongoing Related-Party TransactionsIntercompany billing, management fees, royalty, cost allocationsContemporaneous transfer pricing documentation — Form 3CEB, local file, benchmarking study — prepared as transactions occur, not reconstructed at audit time.Transfer pricing adjustment by the Transfer Pricing Officer, secondary adjustment requiring repatriation, and penalty up to 200% of tax on the adjustment in cases of under-reporting.
Withholding Tax (TDS) on PaymentsEvery payment cycle — rent, professional fees, contractor payments, salaryPayment-by-payment TDS mapping against current thresholds and rates, with correction before the payment is processed rather than after a mismatch is flagged.Expense disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) (30% of the expense), interest on short/non-deduction, and penalty proceedings for persistent default.
Advance Tax InstalmentsEach quarter of the financial yearIn-year re-forecasting of taxable income at each instalment date, adjusting the payment to reflect actual performance rather than a static April estimate.Interest under Section 234B (for shortfall in advance tax overall) and Section 234C (for shortfall in individual instalments) — both computed at 1% per month on the shortfall.
Transaction / Restructuring EventM&A, demerger, slump sale, group reorganisationStructuring advice before the transaction is signed — asset sale versus slump sale versus share transfer, tax-neutral merger conditions under Section 2(1B), and capital gains planning on the exit leg.A transaction structured without tax input can convert what should be a tax-neutral reorganisation into a taxable event, or trigger unplanned capital gains at the wrong entity or individual level.
Tax Audit & Return FilingFinancial year end, ahead of due datesCoordination between advisory positions taken through the year and the tax audit report (Form 3CD) and return (ITR-6), ensuring consistency and defensibility.Positions taken in advisory that are not correctly reflected in the tax audit report create exposure at assessment — inconsistency between advice given and return filed is a common trigger for scrutiny.
Assessment / ScrutinyNotice received from the tax departmentPreparation of technical defence for positions taken, drawing on contemporaneous documentation prepared at the time of the original transaction — not reconstructed after the notice arrives.Positions defended without contemporaneous documentation are far more likely to result in additions, and penalty exposure increases where the position appears to have been an afterthought rather than a considered decision.
Group Structure ChangeNew subsidiary, LLP conversion, or entity closureTax impact assessment of the structural change — carried-forward loss continuity, MAT credit treatment, and transfer pricing implications of the revised group structure.Carried-forward losses and MAT credit can lapse or become unavailable if structural changes (such as a change in shareholding beyond prescribed limits under Section 79) are not planned with tax continuity in mind.
Frequently asked
What exactly does 'corporate tax advisory' cover, versus just filing the company's tax return?

Filing a tax return reports what already happened in the financial year. Corporate tax advisory works on the decisions made before and during the year that determine what the return will ultimately show — which tax regime to elect, how to structure a transaction, how to price a related-party transaction, when to pay advance tax instalments, and how to structure director remuneration and dividends. It is a proactive, ongoing engagement rather than a once-a-year filing exercise.

Practitioner noteWe are often engaged after a return has already been filed under a suboptimal regime election or an undocumented related-party transaction. Advisory engaged before the transaction or the election is always more valuable than advisory engaged to fix it afterward — and some elections simply cannot be undone once made.
Which law currently governs corporate tax in India — the Income-tax Act 1961 or the new Income Tax Act 2025?

The Income Tax Act, 2025 has received presidential assent and will take effect from 1 April 2026 (Assessment Year 2026-27). Until then, the Income-tax Act, 1961 continues to govern — including for the current and immediately preceding financial years' filings, assessments, and advisory work. The new Act substantially reorganises and renumbers provisions while carrying forward most of the underlying tax policy, so section references you see in current advisory material (44AB, 115BAA, 194C, 194J, and so on) remain valid until the transition date.

Practitioner noteWe track both frameworks in parallel. As the 1 April 2026 transition approaches, we will re-map every client's active tax positions and documentation to the new Act's section numbering as part of the annual review — this is not something clients need to track themselves.
What is Section 115BAA and should our company opt into it?

Section 115BAA offers domestic companies a concessional tax rate of 22% (effective approximately 25.17% including surcharge and cess), in exchange for giving up specified deductions and incentives — including additional depreciation and certain investment-linked deductions — and exemption from Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT). The decision is largely irreversible once exercised for a year. Whether it makes sense depends on how much value your company currently derives from the deductions and incentives you would be forfeiting, and your multi-year profitability outlook.

Practitioner noteWe model this decision across at least 2–3 years of projected profitability and deduction utilisation before recommending an election either way. A company with substantial carried-forward losses or unclaimed investment allowances often benefits from delaying the 115BAA election until those benefits are exhausted.
Is angel tax still a risk for our company when we raise our next funding round?

No — not for shares issued now. Section 56(2)(viib), the provision informally known as 'angel tax', which taxed share premium in excess of fair market value as income when shares were issued to resident investors, was abolished with effect from 1 April 2025 (Assessment Year 2025-26 onwards) by the Finance (No. 2) Act, 2024. It no longer applies to fresh share issuances, whether the investor is resident or non-resident. Older assessments relating to share issuances before that date can still be subject to the provision if under dispute.

Practitioner noteWe still recommend obtaining a proper valuation report (from a Merchant Banker or CA) at every fundraising round — not to defend against angel tax, which is no longer live, but because FEMA/FDI pricing guidelines and general governance and investor-diligence expectations still require a defensible fair value.
What is transfer pricing and when does our company need to worry about it?

Transfer pricing rules (Sections 92 to 92F of the Income-tax Act) require that transactions between related parties — including group companies, and cross-border related entities — be priced at 'arm's length', as if the parties were unrelated. This applies to intercompany loans, management fee arrangements, royalty payments, cost allocations, and goods/services transactions between related entities. Once specified thresholds are crossed, the company must obtain an accountant's report (Form 3CEB) and maintain contemporaneous documentation justifying the pricing.

Practitioner noteGroups often start intercompany billing informally — a management fee charged without a documented basis, for instance — and only discover the transfer pricing exposure when a Transfer Pricing Officer questions it years later. We recommend documenting the arm's-length basis for every related-party arrangement from the first transaction, not retrospectively.
What happens if a related-party transaction is found not to be at arm's length?

The Transfer Pricing Officer can make a transfer pricing adjustment — increasing the taxable income of the Indian entity to reflect an arm's-length price. This can trigger a secondary adjustment requiring the excess amount to be treated as a deemed loan and repatriated (with notional interest) if not brought into India within the prescribed period. Penalties can apply for under-reporting or misreporting of income arising from the adjustment, and interest accrues on the additional tax demanded.

Practitioner noteThe single most effective defence against a transfer pricing adjustment is contemporaneous documentation — prepared when the transaction happens, using a benchmarking methodology that would hold up under scrutiny. Documentation prepared after a notice is received is far less persuasive to the Transfer Pricing Officer or, on appeal, to the Tribunal.
How does advance tax work for a company, and what happens if we underpay an instalment?

Companies must pay advance tax in four instalments during the financial year — by 15 June (15%), 15 September (45% cumulative), 15 December (75% cumulative), and 15 March (100% cumulative) of the estimated tax liability for the year. Shortfall in the overall advance tax paid attracts interest under Section 234B at 1% per month from April of the assessment year until payment. Shortfall in any individual instalment attracts interest under Section 234C, also at 1% per month, computed on the shortfall for that instalment.

Practitioner noteWe recompute the advance tax estimate at each instalment date using actual year-to-date performance rather than relying on a static April projection — this materially reduces both 234B and 234C exposure for companies whose profitability fluctuates through the year.
What is MAT and does it still apply to our company?

Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT), under Section 115JB, requires companies to pay tax on a minimum percentage of their book profit (broadly 15%, plus surcharge and cess) where the tax computed under normal provisions is lower — ensuring profitable companies with large deduction claims still pay some tax. MAT does not apply to companies that have opted for the concessional regime under Section 115BAA or 115BAB. It remains relevant for companies on the standard tax regime that continue to claim deductions and incentives.

Practitioner noteCompanies moving from the standard regime to 115BAA lose the ability to carry forward and utilise MAT credit accumulated in earlier years against future standard-regime tax liability, since MAT does not apply once the concessional regime is elected. We factor this forfeited MAT credit explicitly into the regime-election modelling.
How are TDS thresholds on rent and professional fees currently set, and were they recently changed?

Budget 2025 revised several TDS thresholds to reduce compliance burden on smaller payments, effective from 1 April 2025. The threshold for TDS on rent under Section 194-I and on fees for professional or technical services under Section 194J was raised to ₹50,000 in aggregate for the financial year (from the earlier, lower thresholds). Payments below the revised threshold in the relevant financial year are not subject to TDS deduction under these sections; payments at or above the threshold require TDS to be deducted at the applicable rate.

Practitioner noteWe reviewed and updated TDS mapping for every retainer client's vendor and rent payment ledger following the Budget 2025 changes, since a threshold change of this kind directly affects which payments require deduction going forward — getting this wrong in either direction (over-deducting or under-deducting) creates its own set of complications with vendors and with Section 40(a)(ia) exposure.
What is Section 40(a)(ia) and why does it matter for TDS compliance?

Section 40(a)(ia) disallows 30% of an expense (such as rent, professional fees, contractor payments, or commission) as a deduction for the payer if TDS was required to be deducted but was not deducted, or was deducted but not deposited with the government within the prescribed time. This is a direct hit to the company's taxable income — the expense itself may be entirely legitimate and business-related, but the TDS lapse converts 30% of it into non-deductible expenditure, increasing taxable profit and tax payable.

Practitioner noteThis is one of the most common and avoidable sources of additional tax liability we see in first-year reviews of companies that managed their own TDS internally. A monthly TDS reconciliation — matching every applicable payment against deduction and deposit records — prevents this from accumulating unnoticed across a financial year.
How should we structure director remuneration versus dividends from a tax perspective?

Director remuneration is a deductible expense for the company (reducing corporate tax) and is taxed in the director's hands as salary income at their applicable slab rate. Dividends are not deductible to the company (paid out of after-tax profit) and are taxed in the shareholder's hands at their applicable slab rate, with no separate dividend distribution tax since FY 2020-21. The optimal mix depends on the company's tax regime, the director's other income and slab, TDS and withholding mechanics, and cash-flow considerations such as PF/ESI obligations that attach to salary but not dividends.

Practitioner noteThere is no universal right answer here — it depends heavily on the director's personal tax position (including the revised new-regime slabs from Budget 2025) alongside the company's regime election. We run this as a joint company-and-individual tax model at least annually, and whenever either side's tax position changes materially.
What is Section 94B and how does it affect financing structures?

Section 94B limits the tax deductibility of interest paid by an Indian company (or permanent establishment of a foreign company) to an associated enterprise, where such interest expense exceeds ₹1 crore and represents more than 30% of the company's EBITDA. Interest in excess of this limit is disallowed in the year it is incurred, though it can be carried forward for a limited number of subsequent years and set off against permitted interest deduction limits in those years. This is India's implementation of thin-capitalisation / base erosion rules.

Practitioner noteThis provision most commonly affects Indian subsidiaries of foreign parent companies that are funded substantially through related-party debt rather than equity. We review the debt-to-EBITDA ratio on intercompany financing before it is drawn down, not after the interest expense has already been incurred and disallowed.
Our company plans a merger with a group entity — what are the tax implications?

A merger structured and approved under Sections 230–232 of the Companies Act 2013, and meeting the specific conditions in Section 2(1B) of the Income-tax Act, qualifies as a tax-neutral 'amalgamation' — meaning the transfer of assets to the resulting company and the issue of shares to shareholders of the merging company do not themselves trigger capital gains tax, and carried-forward losses of the amalgamating company may be permitted to carry forward in the resulting company subject to specified conditions (particularly stringent for certain categories such as manufacturing companies under Section 72A). Structuring the merger to meet these conditions requires careful drafting of the scheme.

Practitioner noteA merger scheme drafted purely for corporate law purposes, without tax input at the drafting stage, frequently fails to meet the specific conditions required for tax-neutral treatment or loss carry-forward — turning what should be a tax-neutral reorganisation into a taxable event. We review the scheme document before it goes to the NCLT for approval.
What is a slump sale, and how is it taxed differently from an itemised asset sale?

A slump sale is the transfer of an entire business undertaking (or a defined part of it) as a going concern, for a lump-sum consideration, without assigning individual values to specific assets and liabilities. Under Section 50B, capital gains on a slump sale are computed as the difference between the sale consideration and the 'net worth' of the undertaking (broadly, book value of assets less liabilities), taxed as long-term or short-term capital gains depending on how long the undertaking has been held. An itemised asset sale, by contrast, computes gains separately for each asset class, which can produce a very different — sometimes higher — tax outcome depending on the assets involved.

Practitioner noteThe choice between a slump sale and an itemised sale is a structuring decision that should be modelled before the transaction documents are drafted — reworking the structure after signing is far more difficult and often triggers additional stamp duty and legal cost on top of any tax inefficiency.
What is Form 3CEB and who is required to file it?

Form 3CEB is an accountant's report certifying the international transactions and specified domestic transactions a company has entered into with related/associated parties, and confirming the arm's-length nature of the pricing applied. It must be filed by companies whose related-party transactions cross the prescribed thresholds — for international transactions, essentially any material related-party cross-border transaction; for specified domestic transactions, above the threshold set out in Section 92BA. It is filed alongside the return, generally by 31 October, and requires a chartered accountant's certification distinct from the statutory or tax audit.

Practitioner noteForm 3CEB certification requires more than reviewing invoices — it requires an underlying benchmarking analysis showing the transaction pricing is consistent with what unrelated parties would have agreed. We build this analysis through the year as transactions occur, rather than compressing months of documentation work into the weeks before the filing deadline.
What is the difference between the 'local file', 'master file', and Country-by-Country Report in transfer pricing?

The local file is entity-specific documentation justifying the pricing of a particular company's related-party transactions — this is the core documentation most Indian companies with related-party transactions need to maintain. The master file (required where consolidated group revenue and the value of international transactions cross prescribed thresholds under Section 92D) provides a group-wide overview of the multinational's business, its transfer pricing policies, and its global allocation of income and economic activity. The Country-by-Country Report (CbCR), required only for very large multinational groups above a much higher consolidated revenue threshold, reports revenue, profit, tax paid, and headcount by tax jurisdiction.

Practitioner noteMost of our mid-market clients need only the local file. We assess master file and CbCR applicability specifically based on group-level consolidated revenue — this is a group-wide threshold, not an entity-level one, and is often misunderstood by companies that assume it does not apply to them without checking the consolidated figure.
How does PNPC's UAE presence help with cross-border corporate tax planning?

PNPC operates from Chennai, Bangalore, and Hyderabad in India and from Dubai in the UAE. For groups with an Indian company and a UAE entity — whether an Indian company with a UAE subsidiary, or a UAE group setting up an Indian operating or holding company — we coordinate the India-side corporate tax planning (transfer pricing, withholding tax on cross-border payments, DTAA application) with the UAE-side corporate tax and VAT position under one engagement, rather than handing off between disconnected advisors in each jurisdiction.

Practitioner noteThe interaction between Indian withholding tax, the India-UAE Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement, and UAE Corporate Tax (introduced with effect from financial years starting on or after 1 June 2023) has real planning implications for management fees, royalty, and intercompany financing flows between the two jurisdictions — we advise on this as one coordinated matter.
What is a Tax Residency Certificate (TRC) and why does it matter for cross-border payments?

A Tax Residency Certificate is a document issued by the tax authority of a foreign jurisdiction certifying that a person or entity is a tax resident of that jurisdiction for a given period. Under Section 90(4)/90A(4) of the Income-tax Act, a non-resident payee must furnish a TRC (along with Form 10F and other prescribed particulars) to claim the benefit of a lower withholding tax rate under a Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement, rather than the higher rate that would otherwise apply under the Income-tax Act.

Practitioner noteMissing or incomplete TRC/Form 10F documentation is one of the most common reasons a company ends up deducting TDS at the higher domestic rate on a cross-border payment, rather than the lower DTAA rate — even where the recipient genuinely qualifies for treaty benefit. We build the document collection into the payment process itself, before the remittance is made.
Can our tax advisory retainer with PNPC also cover TDS compliance and Form 15CA/15CB certification?

Yes — PNPC offers dedicated TDS compliance and Form 15CA/15CB service lines that integrate with the corporate tax advisory retainer. Many clients combine all three, since the underlying data (payment ledgers, cross-border remittance details, related-party transaction records) overlaps substantially. Clients who only need one of these can also engage them as standalone services.

Practitioner noteWe recommend combining these where a company has meaningful cross-border activity, since the corporate tax advisory context (transfer pricing positions, DTAA planning) directly informs the correct TDS rate and Form 15CB certification for each remittance — disconnected advisors working from partial information create inconsistency risk.
How does a corporate tax advisory retainer with PNPC actually work — is it a subscription or project-based?

Most clients engage PNPC on an ongoing retainer basis — a fixed periodic fee covering scheduled reviews (regime election, quarterly advance tax planning, annual pre-year-end review) plus availability for transaction-specific advisory as it arises (a fundraise, a restructuring, a new related-party arrangement). Some clients engage us project-by-project for a specific transaction instead. The right model depends on how frequently your company's tax position changes and how much ongoing complexity (related-party transactions, cross-border flows, multiple entities) is involved.

Practitioner noteWe scope this explicitly at the outset — a company with a single, stable structure and no related-party transactions may only need a lighter annual review, while a group with active intercompany transactions and periodic transactions benefits far more from the ongoing retainer model. We do not default every client into the same package.
What happens if our company receives a scrutiny notice questioning a tax position we took in an earlier year?

A scrutiny or reassessment notice requires a documented, technically sound response defending the position originally taken — supported by the underlying rationale, contemporaneous documentation (such as transfer pricing benchmarking or a merger scheme's tax analysis), and relevant case law. Responses assembled after the notice arrives, without contemporaneous documentation from when the position was originally taken, are significantly weaker than responses built on documentation prepared at the time.

Practitioner noteThis is precisely why we emphasise documenting the rationale for every material tax position at the time it is taken — not only for compliance discipline, but because it is the single biggest determinant of how defensible that position is if questioned two or three years later in scrutiny.
How do carried-forward losses interact with a change in shareholding or a group restructuring?

Section 79 restricts the carry-forward and set-off of losses for closely-held companies (companies in which the public are not substantially interested) where there is a change in shareholding beyond prescribed limits, subject to specific exceptions (such as changes arising from certain amalgamations, demergers, or transfers between group companies meeting prescribed conditions). A restructuring, fundraise, or share transfer that changes the shareholding pattern without checking this provision can inadvertently forfeit valuable carried-forward losses.

Practitioner noteWe check Section 79 exposure as a standard step before any fundraise or share transfer for a company sitting on carried-forward losses — this is exactly the kind of provision that a corporate lawyer structuring the share transfer, without a tax advisor in the room, can easily miss.
Does corporate tax advisory cover GST as well, or is that a separate service?

Corporate tax advisory as PNPC scopes it focuses on direct/income tax — corporate tax rate elections, transfer pricing, TDS, capital gains, and transaction structuring. GST advisory (rate classification, input tax credit optimisation, GST implications of a restructuring) is a related but distinct service line, since GST operates under the CGST Act 2017 with its own rate structure — rationalised in September 2025 into a simplified slab structure — and procedural framework. For transactions with both direct tax and GST implications (such as a slump sale or an asset transfer), PNPC coordinates both advisory streams together.

Practitioner noteWe flag GST implications whenever they arise in a corporate tax engagement — a slump sale, for instance, has GST treatment considerations distinct from its income-tax treatment — but clients with an ongoing, GST-heavy advisory need typically also engage our dedicated GST services line for full coverage.
What records should we keep to support a tax position if it is ever questioned years later?

For any material tax position — a regime election, a related-party pricing decision, a restructuring's tax-neutrality claim, a large deduction claimed — retain the underlying business rationale memo, board approvals, valuation or benchmarking reports relied upon, correspondence with advisors at the time, and the specific provisions and any professional opinion relied upon. Indian tax law generally allows reassessment for several years after the relevant assessment year (the exact period depends on the nature and quantum of the alleged escapement of income), so documentation retention needs to extend well beyond the filing year itself.

Practitioner noteWe maintain a structured advisory file for every retainer client precisely for this reason — when a position taken three years ago is questioned, having the original rationale, the data relied upon, and the professional judgment documented at the time makes the difference between a straightforward response and a reconstruction exercise under time pressure.
Is corporate tax advisory only relevant for large companies, or does it apply to smaller private companies too?

It applies to any company making structural or transactional tax decisions — regime election, related-party transactions, financing structure, or a planned transaction — regardless of size. A smaller private company making its first regime election, taking its first related-party loan from a group entity, or planning its first fundraise faces exactly the same structuring decisions as a larger company, just at a smaller scale. The value of getting these decisions right the first time is proportionally just as significant for a smaller company's cash flow and tax burden.

Practitioner noteWe scale the engagement to the company's actual complexity — a smaller company with a single related-party loan needs a lighter-touch review than a group with multiple intercompany flows across jurisdictions, but the underlying discipline of planning before the transaction rather than reporting after it applies at every scale.
What is the practical difference between tax avoidance, tax evasion, and legitimate tax planning?

Tax evasion is illegal — concealing income, falsifying documents, or deliberately misreporting facts to reduce tax liability. Tax avoidance, in the pejorative sense often used by tax authorities, refers to artificial or contrived arrangements structured mainly or solely to obtain a tax benefit without genuine commercial substance — India's General Anti-Avoidance Rule (GAAR) under Chapter X-A targets such 'impermissible avoidance arrangements'. Legitimate tax planning uses the choices and reliefs Parliament has deliberately built into the law — regime elections, tax-neutral restructuring provisions, DTAA benefits, timing of expenditure — applied to arrangements that have genuine commercial substance.

Practitioner noteGAAR exists specifically to distinguish structuring with real commercial rationale from arrangements engineered purely for tax benefit with no other purpose. Every structuring recommendation we make is grounded in genuine commercial rationale for the client's business — this is not just good practice, it is what keeps the structure defensible if GAAR or any other anti-avoidance provision is ever invoked.
How often should a company revisit its tax regime election and overall tax structure?

At minimum, annually — as part of a pre-year-end review, since profitability, deduction utilisation, and business plans change year to year. More frequent review is warranted whenever a material event occurs: a significant new investment or capital expenditure, a fundraise, a new related-party arrangement, a change in group structure, or a legislative change (such as the transition to the Income Tax Act 2025) that could affect the numbers underlying an earlier decision.

Practitioner noteWe build an annual structured review into every retainer, timed for the January–March window so that any adjustments that need to be made before the financial year closes can still be made — reviewing the position only after the year has ended removes most of the planning options that were available.
What is the tax treatment of capital gains for a company selling shares in another company (an investment, not its own business)?

Gains from the sale of shares held as a capital asset by a company are taxed as capital gains — long-term or short-term depending on the holding period (generally over 24 months for unlisted shares to qualify as long-term, though listed equity shares have their own shorter threshold and STT-linked rate structure). The applicable rate and indexation benefit depend on the classification and the specific type of security. This is distinct from gains on the sale of shares held as stock-in-trade (taxed as business income) — the classification itself is a fact-specific determination based on the company's intent and pattern of dealing.

Practitioner noteWhether a company's shareholding in another entity is a capital asset or stock-in-trade is not always obvious, and the tax outcome differs meaningfully between the two classifications. We review this classification explicitly before a share sale is finalised, particularly for companies that hold a mix of long-term strategic investments and more frequently traded positions.
Does PNPC represent the company before tax authorities during an assessment or appeal?

Yes. PNPC represents clients in assessment proceedings, responds to scrutiny notices, and prepares submissions and appeals before the appellate authorities, working from the advisory positions and documentation built up through the engagement. Where litigation reaches the Tribunal or higher courts, we coordinate with tax counsel while continuing to manage the underlying technical and documentary preparation.

Practitioner noteHaving advised on the original position gives us a significant advantage in defending it later — we already understand the commercial rationale and have the contemporaneous documentation, rather than having to reconstruct the client's reasoning from scratch when a notice arrives years after the transaction.
How does corporate tax advisory differ for a company planning an IPO versus staying privately held?

A company planning an IPO faces additional tax considerations — SEBI disclosure requirements around tax contingencies and litigation, the tax treatment of any pre-IPO restructuring (such as converting preference shares or consolidating group entities), and heightened scrutiny of historical tax positions during due diligence. A privately held company without near-term listing plans has more flexibility in timing certain elections and less immediate pressure to resolve every open tax position, though the underlying discipline of accurate reporting applies equally.

Practitioner noteWe treat IPO-track companies differently from Day 1 of engagement — cleaning up related-party documentation, regularising any historical TDS or regime-election issues, and ensuring every material tax position has a clear paper trail, since these become direct line items in IPO due diligence and prospectus disclosure.
What is the interplay between corporate tax planning and the statutory/tax audit function — can PNPC do both?

Corporate tax advisory and the statutory or tax audit are related but distinct functions, and independence requirements under the Companies Act 2013 and ICAI's Code of Ethics restrict a firm from simultaneously providing certain services to the same client where independence could be compromised — particularly for listed and larger companies. For many private companies, PNPC can provide both tax advisory and tax audit services, but we assess independence requirements on a case-by-case basis and will recommend a separate auditor where the rules or good governance practice require it.

Practitioner noteWe would rather lose an audit engagement than compromise independence — this is a professional standards matter, not a commercial one, and we advise clients transparently on where the line sits for their specific company.
Our company has never had a formal tax advisory engagement — what does the first diagnostic review actually look like?

The initial diagnostic review maps your current tax regime election, deduction and incentive utilisation, group structure, all related-party transactions, carried-forward losses and MAT credit position, and outstanding TDS or compliance gaps — essentially a full picture of where tax risk and opportunity currently sit. From this, we build specific, prioritised recommendations rather than a generic checklist, and agree the ongoing advisory scope with you based on what the diagnostic actually surfaces.

Practitioner noteThe diagnostic frequently surfaces at least one item the company was not tracking — an undocumented related-party transaction, an unclaimed deduction, or a TDS threshold that changed and was not updated in the payment process. This is normal, and the diagnostic exists precisely to find these before they become a bigger problem.
What does PNPC charge for a corporate tax advisory engagement?

Fees are agreed in writing before the engagement begins and depend on the complexity of your structure — number of related entities, volume and nature of related-party transactions, and whether the engagement is retainer-based or project-specific for a single transaction. We are not the lowest-cost option in the market; the value is in the specificity of the modelling and the ongoing availability through the year, not a generic annual filing fee.

Practitioner noteAsk for a written scope and fee letter before any engagement begins — we provide this as standard, and a firm unwilling to commit fees to writing upfront is worth being cautious about.
Why should we engage PNPC rather than handle tax planning internally with our accounts team?

An internal accounts team is well placed to handle routine bookkeeping and return preparation, but corporate tax planning decisions — regime elections, transfer pricing exposure, transaction structuring, GAAR-sensitive arrangements — carry professional judgment, technical depth, and independence considerations that benefit from a practising CA firm's ongoing exposure across many similar situations. PNPC has advised businesses across India and the UAE since 1986, and brings pattern recognition from a breadth of client situations that an internal team focused on one company cannot replicate.

Practitioner noteThe clients who benefit most from this engagement are ones with an internal accounts or finance team already in place — we work alongside that team, handling the structuring judgment and transaction-specific advisory, while the internal team continues to own day-to-day bookkeeping and filing mechanics.
Why PNPC Global

PNPC Corporate Tax Advisory vs typical alternatives

AspectPNPC GlobalGeneric filing portalInternal accounts team aloneLarge multinational firm
Pre-transaction structuring adviceYes — modelled before the decision is madeNo — return preparation onlyLimited — depends on in-house expertise depthYes, but often at premium pricing and with junior staff on day-to-day execution
Regime election modelling (115BAA/115BAB)Multi-year modelling specific to your deduction profileNot offeredPossible but often without multi-year projection disciplineOffered, typically as a discrete billable project
Transfer pricing documentationContemporaneous, built through the yearNot offeredRarely maintained proactively without promptingOffered, often with significant fee premium
Cross-border India-UAE coordinationSingle engagement across Chennai, Bangalore, Hyderabad and Dubai officesNot offeredNot available in-houseAvailable but typically via separate regional teams with handoff friction
Continuity across the tax transition (1961 Act to 2025 Act)Actively tracked and re-mapped for clients ahead of 1 April 2026Not proactively managedDepends on internal team's specialist tax knowledgeTracked, generally as part of broader advisory retainer
Assessment & scrutiny representationYes — using documentation built during advisoryNot offeredRequires engaging external counsel separatelyYes, typically available
Fee transparencyWritten scope and fixed fee agreed upfrontLow-cost but narrow scopeInternal cost, but opportunity cost of expertise gapsOften higher, with scope creep risk on complex matters
Relationship continuitySame senior CA team across advisory, audit coordination, and assessment supportTransactional, ticket-basedConsistent but limited to internal capabilityCan vary with staff turnover on the engagement team

What the PNPC package includes

  1. 01

    Diagnostic review of current tax regime, structure, and deduction utilisation

  2. 02

    Multi-year regime election modelling (115BAA/115BAB vs standard regime)

  3. 03

    Related-party transaction mapping and transfer pricing documentation (Form 3CEB, local file)

  4. 04

    Transaction structuring advisory for mergers, demergers, slump sales, and share transfers

  5. 05

    Capital structure and thin-capitalisation (Section 94B) review

  6. 06

    TDS/withholding tax framework review and vendor payment mapping

  7. 07

    Quarterly advance tax computation and instalment planning

  8. 08

    Director remuneration and dividend policy structuring

  9. 09

    Cross-border DTAA and Tax Residency Certificate advisory

  10. 10

    Assessment, scrutiny, and appellate representation

  11. 11

    Annual pre-year-end tax planning review

  12. 12

    Coordinated India-UAE cross-border tax advisory from our Dubai office

Corporate tax decisions made without planning are decisions made twice — once when the transaction happens, and again, at a cost, when the tax department questions it. Talk to PNPC before the next election, transaction, or related-party arrangement — not after.

← Back to Income Tax
Talk to a CA